Tag Archives: Anne Brontë

Agnes Grey by Anne Brontë

Agnes Grey - Anne BrontëAgnes Grey – Anne Brontë
Oxford World’s Classics 2008 (originally published 1847)
Buy: Amazon | Bookdepository * 

Anne Brontë is generally considered the least popular of the Brontë sisters. Her books aren’t as well-known as either Jane Eyre or Wuthering Heights. And where Jane Eyre is easy to fall in love with, and lots of people either hate or love Wuthering Heights, Anne’s books generally elicit the least strong reactions. Anne might also be the Brontë sister that is most often forgotten. Recent example? The fact that Jude Morgan’s The Taste of Sorrow is called “Charlotte and Emily” in the United States. Not that Anne is not just as much part of the book as Charlotte and Emily are, but I am guessing that her name is not expected to do well for publicity purposes.

I have to say that in a way I agree with the general opinion that there is not as much “spark” in Anne’s Agnes Grey as there is in Jane Eyre. And that maybe the world she created isn’t as innovative as Emily’s Wuthering Heights. But while reading The Taste of Sorrow, I developed a sympathy for Anne Brontë, which frankly, made me want to like this book. And I did like it, even if it is different, maybe not as exciting.

Everyone who knows a little about the life of Anne Brontë, can feel as soon as you start reading Agnes Grey, that much of it must be based on Anne’s experiences as a governess. And it is not a pretty picture she paints. I felt for both Agnes and Anne while reading the book. First, the cruelty of the Bloomsfield household. The uninterested demeanor of the parents, and the way they did not allow Agnes to punish the kids, yet not because they were against hitting or punishment of any kind, but because they wanted to keep that right to themselves. And all the while they wonder why Agnes cannot keep the children in check. And then the absolute wretchedness of the episode with the birds. Those poor, poor birds. And poor, poor Agnes.

Then, as if the first household wasn’t bad enough, the Murray’s. The children and parents hurt Agnes in a different, yet not less painful way. The proud demeanor, the way they choose to ignore the governess as someone below them in class. So much so that ‘even the servants’ (ah, how class is always a part of stories) refuse to acknowledge her.

As none of the before-mentioned ladies and gentlemen ever noticed me, it was disagreeable to walk beside them, as if listening to what they said, or wishing to be thought one of them, while they talked over me or across, and if their eyes, in speaking, chanced to fall on me, it seemed as if they looked on vacancy – as if they either did not see me, or were very desirous to make it appear so.

It was disagreeable too, to walk behind, and thus appear to acknowledge my own inferiority; for in truth, I considered myself pretty near as good as the best of them, and wished them to know that I did so, and not to imagine that I looked upon myself as a mere domestic, who knew her own place too well to walk beside such fine ladies and gentlemen as they were… though her young ladies might choose to have her with them, and even condescend to converse with her, when no other company were at hand.

The quoted text above shows perfectly how Anne Brontë writes, I think. She paints a situation, that I, as a shy person that often feels ignored in this manner and not because of class, can completely relate to. And yet Agnes does not submit to the unfairness of the treatment she receives. She never does. Nor does she compromise her own morals, ever. I wonder if that is why so many find it hard to like her, as a character? Is it like what happens in Mansfield Park, with Fanny? Is she too upright, too prim, too much set in the background and yet self-assertive?

Anyway, I have to say I liked the portrayal of the second family in which Agnes works better. There are more conflicts, more sides to the story. Miss Murray, for example, she is cruel and proud and condescending. And yet, at times, you feel a little for her: her scheming mama with her wish to marry her off to an unworthy man. The story also shows how Agnes, despite everything, grows to care for her pupils. Even if she would not give up her whole life for them.

There are aspects to this story that I liked, apart from the main storyline. There is the portrayal of Agnes’ belief. A belief, not in the hierarchical organisational structure of the church, but in a manner of life that is dedicated to God and helping others. It shows in her portrayal and comparison of the clergymen, Mr. Hatfield and Mr. Weston. There is also her portrayal of the struggles the poor lady Agnes visits goes through to come to the right faith, contrasted with the carelessness of the ladies under Agnes’ care. And then there is this small sentence, somewhere at the end of the book, that I had to write down because I felt it was such a strong thing to say:

The best way to enjoy yourself is to do what is right and hate nobody. The end of Religion is not to teach us how to die, but how to live; and the earlier you become wise and good, the more of happiness you secure.

There are other themes besides the cruelty towards governesses and ideas on religion to be found in Agnes Grey. For example, there is Agnes as a girl, eager to work as a governess to assert her place as a (somewhat) independent woman. (I love how this theme seems to be a part of the works of the Brontës! Um, yes, I base that on the few books I have read by them):

“You think, because I always do as you bid me, I have no judgement of my own: but only try me- that is all I ask- and you shall see what I can do”

or:

How delightful it would be to be a governess! To go out into the world; to enter into a new life; to act for myself; to exercise my unused faculties; to try my unknown powers; to earn my own maintenance, and something to comfort and help my father, mother, and sister, besides exonerating them from the provision of my food and clothing; to show papa what his little Agnes could do; to convince mamma and Mary that I was not quite the helpless, thoughtless being they supposed.

Naive? Yes, a little. In her enthousiasm to become a governess, surely. But, even if Anne shows that she is naive for thinking being a governess is easy, she never rejects the ideals of “acting for yourself”, of truly becoming an individual in your own right.

So yes, Agnes Grey might not be my all-time-favourite Brontë. The emotions that Charlotte’s Jane Eyre elicits in me are not easy to surpass. But Agnes Grey is a worthy read.

There is one last quote that I just had to include. Look, there is a hint of sarcasm too:

“You’re to go to the schoolroom directly, mum- the young ladies is WAITING!!

Climax of horror! actually waiting for their governess!!!

This is an affiliate link. If you buy a product through this link, I will receive a small percentage of the purchase price.

The Taste of Sorrow by Jude Morgan

The Taste of Sorrow - Jude MorganThe Taste of Sorrow – Jude Morgan
Headline Review, 2009

I may have made little squeaky noises while jumping up and down (don’t ask) when I unwrapped Gnoe‘s Christmas parcel this December. The Taste of Sorrow was the book I was most eagerly looking forward to owning, and I had almost given up on receiving it for Christmas since my parents had not been able to find it in the bookstore. Happily, the book lived up to my high expectations, and more. So thank you again, Gnoe, for this wonderful gift!

The Taste of Sorrow is a fictionalised biography of the Brontë sisters. Since I knew next to nothing about the lives of the Brontës before reading this book, I cannot remark on the historical accuracy of the book. But, I can say, that the sisters felt very real to me. Morgan paints all of the sisters as individuals, with their own charms and faults. The fact that the book is written in the present tense helped me feel even more engaged. It really feels like you are living Emily’s, Anne’s and Charlotte’s lives alongside them. That, and the superb writing, is what makes the book incredibly hard to put down.

There are several reasons why I loved this book so much. Ana points out one very important one in her post on the book, when she says that the suffering and death of Emily and Anne are not portrayed as martyr-like qualities, but are instead depicted as the tragedies they were. The book shows  how shocking and sad and please-I-do-not-want-to-give-up-yet death at a young age often is. The sisters are no heroes, they are persons. They are charming in their own ways, they have flaws, they get cranky, they get sad, they can be hopeful. Look how I start to write as if Morgan’s version of the sisters are the sisters? It is not that he claims he knows the truth, it is simply that he writes in such a convincing manner.

Hopeful? You say, but the book is called “The Taste of Sorrow”. And yes, there is a reason for that, but that does not mean that the sisters did not have plans, did not aim to take control of their life (wanting to start their own school, writing novels and publishing them). But it is undeniable that sorrow is a heavy ingredient in this book. I did not feel sad all the time while reading it, but melancholic? definitely. Here are three sisters, who have lost their elder two sisters when they died at school, who have a brother Branwell who wastes his life and theirs along with it. They try to make a life for themselves, but often Branwell makes it impossible for them to do so. And if not him, it is their father. Who bluntly tells Charlotte when she says she wants to be a published author, that is an unworthy thing to do for a woman and that certainly she won’t be able to do so. Here are three sisters that have a lot of accomplishments, but who are expected to put all their hopes in their brother, who proceeds to get drunk, most of the time.

My feelings towards Branwell Brontë go a long way to paint what a fabulous job Jude Morgan does as an author. I did not know anything about Branwell. I somehow thought I was meant to admire him. I have heard people speak highly of him before. But from the very start, I felt uncomfortable with him. I felt I could not like him. And yet I did not know what disappointments were to come. I struggled with my feelings, why could I not like him? And then, slowly, bit by bit, I started to feel justified in my feelings towards him. Jude Morgan does a perfect job of setting up the relationships in the family: the admiration and expectations that are directed at Branwell, his sometimes arrogance, sometimes insecurity, his indulgence in the fact that he is the “man of the house”. The struggle of the sisters with the general disappointment in him, but also their unconditional love for their brother.

Ah, I’m afraid this post is not going to convince many of you to pick this book up, with my unconditional gushing. But please do.  There is so much to it. The book is not just about the Brontë sisters, but also about being a woman in the nineteenth century and how hard it was to build your own life at the time. How intellectual accomplishment can isolate you from the outside world.  It is also about social expectations, the ruin drink and drugs can bring to a whole family, the sadness of death & the escape imagination can bring.

Admittedly, the style of the book takes a little getting into. But once you’re past 20 pages, it makes you appreciate the story all the more. Jude Morgan does a great job in painting the atmosphere of the parsonage and the family life of the Brontës. The Taste of Sorrow made me appreciate the Brontës even more. It helped me turn my Jane Eyre obsession into, what I think will be a lasting Brontë obsession. I have a feeling I might understand Emily a little better. I feel an instant respect for Anne. And I love how I now feel I “know” all of them a little better, not just one of the three, not just Charlotte.

Can I say one more thing? Something that angers me? Why, oh why, did they decide to rename the US edition “Charlotte and Emily”? The equality of all sisters is underlined again and again in this book, even Maria and Elizabeth play a part, why ignore Anne in the title?

The Brontës, a Reading List

I recently fell in love (or fell in love all over again) with Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë. I also love making reading lists. So what is a better way of keeping myself occupied than combining the two? I decided to add the other Brontë sisters to my list as well, but I do admit that I have mainly focused on Charlotte Brontë.

Original Work:
Shirley – Charlotte Brontë
Vilette – Charlotte Brontë
The Professor – Charlotte Brontë
Agnes Grey – Anne Brontë
The Tenant of Wildfell Hall – Anne Brontë
Wuthering Heights – Emily Brontë: reread?
Tales of Glass Town, Angria, and Gondal: Selected Early Writings – The Brontës

Related Fiction (even if only a title reference):
Wide Sargasso Sea – Jean Rhys
Rebecca – Daphne Du Maurier
Thornycroft Hall – Emma Jane Worboise
Miss Miles: A Tale of Yorkshire Life 60 Years Ago – Mary Taylor
Nine Coaches Waiting – Mary Stewart
The Eyre Affair – Jasper Fforde
The Brontës Went to Woolworths – Rachel Ferguson
Teas with Mr. Rochester – Frences Towers

Contemporary/YA:
Jane Airhead – Kay Woodward
Becoming Jane Eyre – Sheila Kohler
Romancing Miss Brontë – Juliet Gael
Wuthering Bites – Sarah Gray
Jane – April Lindner

Non-Fiction:
The Life of Charlotte Brontë – Elizabeth Gaskell
Selected Letters – Charlotte Brontë
Brontë in Love – Sarah Freeman
The Taste of Sorrow – Jude Morgan (fictional biography)
The Three Brontës/The Three Sisters – May Sinclair

Note 1: I want to acknowledge the very useful and informative Brontë Blog for providing links to lots of works on the Brontës.
Note 2: This list is by no means complete. As you can see on the Brontë Blog, there is an endless amount of texts on the Brontës, this is just a very small selection of books that I think I would like to read.
Note 3: Please feel free to give me any more suggestions as to what you think I should read!