I ended up buying too many books..

At first I was going to title this post “I blame Ana..” but that seemed a little harsh. And really, she did not make me buy the books. Actually, it was nice to have someone encouraging me to buy books instead of making me feel weird about buying that many. Although I admit, by the end of the day she was laughing at me as well.. 21 books in the few days I have been in the UK is crazy! But they were so tempting! And cheap! And yay charity shops! Ana made some of these sound SO good. Take a look for yourself.

P1100243

I did well, right? (You can click on the photo to enlarge it because I am too lazy to type out all the titles). I like to think I did well. Even if at the same time I want to hide in shame because of how many books I ended up buying! I wonder if they’ll fit into my suitcase..

P.S. If you actually counted them you might notice that there’s 22. That’s because Ana was kind enough to buy me a gift book :D The Hilary McKay one which sounds really good!

P.P.S. I just realised I provided absolutely no context for this post: I am visiting Ana for a few days which is awesome :D And I managed to get to meet some great other bloggers as well, which is also awesome! Yay!

Irises by Francisco X. Stork

Irises - Francisco X StorkIrises – Francisco X. Stork
Narrated by Carrington Macduffy

Listening Library, 2012
Buy: Amazon | Bookdepository *

I think I might not need explain why I chose this particular audiobook. Given my first name, anything that carries the name “Iris” has an almost irrational appeal for me.

Thus, when Audiobook Sync had Irises as part of their free download list last year, I could hardly resist. By the way, I should probably add that I love the idea behind Sync and that even though not all of their titles appeal to me, it is a great way to discover new-to-me authors or books that I might never have heard of otherwise. Irises and Francisco X. Stork are a great example of that.

In Irises, the reader follows two sisters, Kate and Mary, while they struggle to face the challenges of their newly changed life. Raised by their loving but strict parents, everything changes when their mother becomes comatose after a car accident, and their father, who used to be the minister of the local church, dies of a heart attack. Kate and Mary both have their own dreams and talents. Kate is bound for Stanford and Med School, while Mary is a talented painter of mostly flowers. But faced with the grief and new responsibilities and difficulties upon the loss of their father and the effort to take the best care of their mother, both Kate and Mary need to reevaluate their own dreams and their responsibilities and love for each other.

Honestly? I almost did not continue listening to this book after the first disc. Their father being a Christian minister, and Kate and Mary often reflecting on their belief, the restrictions they experienced in it, the joy it could bring them.. Not to mention the overtly dramatic and somewhat.. surreal? opening scene.. It should have been a story that appealed to me but instead I found myself hesitating: was this going to be the same old story of loss and acceptance? Was this going to be too Christian without raising questions for me to feel comfortable with?

I admit, and I knew, this is (apart from the opening scene which really was not all that good) my own personal background speaking: being raised in an atheist family, it somehow became ingrained to turn away from any media that might veer towards evangelisation. Not that I think this book does so. Upon reflection, I don’t think those feelings do the book any justice. Instead, I feel the book offers (what I expect to be) a realistic portrayal of the different meanings faith can have in human life, without making it only about faith, and not only about the positive sides of it either, but instead integrating it in a story that is about much more and perhaps more urgent issues for the characters.

I decided to give the book another try when Amy mentioned it in her post about the best books she read in 2012. And I am happy I gave it another try. For while the book may not have been a perfect read for me, and I think it is flawed, it does pack a lot of complicated issues and overflows with compassion and feeling at certain points.

As I mentioned, Irises raises a lot of big questions, which I can hardly discuss here without spoiling the key moments of the book. It deals with ideas about life and death, about the value of art, about family and individuality, about priorities and different concepts of selfishness. It certainly packs a lot. Things I had not expected to find in there. A lot of reflection and understanding for the bigger and smaller issues girls aged 14-18 face, but mostly those that all of us might have to deal with, whatever age we are. This might be what I appreciated most in the book: its room for introspection, for the motivation of these two girls, for showing how what from the outside might easily be labeled one thing can be motivated by a lot of conflicting emotions for the individual in question. The beauty of it is that the raising of these issues never felt artificial, but they were instead incorporated into the story of these two individual girls and their daily life.

The book is told through alternating viewpoints. In one chapter you follow Mary, in another Kate. As such, you become acquainted with their own thoughts, motivations, and feelings. And while I might feel exasperated at the choices of Kate in one chapter, the following might contextualize it and make it more understandable. The drawback of this was that sometimes the storyline felt a little too slow for me, and I saw some of the key points coming from a long way off. I wonder if this was the audio? I do not know if it was the story itself or listening to it that made me feel just one step removed from the characters at most times. Even so, by the last third of the book, I was (and this came as a surprise to me) deeply involved in what was happening, and hardly dared listen to it on my morning and evening walk for fear I might have to hide a few stray tears on my face each time.

In the end, I am happy I gave Irises another try. It was not perfect, and I think the book might work better on paper than on audio, but mostly in the latter half of the book I came to appreciate it a lot for what it dares to discuss and for the sensitivity and compassion with which this is done.

I have read that Francisco X. Stork’s other novels might be better, so I am quite curious to give them a try. By a stroke of luck, I came across his Marcelo in the Real World the other day..

Other Opinions: Rhapsody in Books, Book Addiction, My Friend Amy, bookshelves of doom, Beth Fish Reads, Annette’s Book Spot, Little Library Muse, Yours?

* These are affiliate links. If you buy a product through either of them, I will receive a small percentage of the purchase price.

War and Peace: Check-In #4

The selected section for the month April during the War and Peace Read Along were the first two parts of Book II.

warandpeace2013

I have to admit that I found these two parts much more enjoyable than the parts we read for February and March. As Helen put it in a comment, “I was happy that there was more ‘peace’ than ‘war’ in April’s reading!” While I have accepted that war is an inevitable part of this novel (heh), I still struggle with how conditioned I am to “just look away” during battle scenes in movies, or skimming pages of battle scenes in books. I also find it very difficult to picture what is written about the battle scenes, I simply cannot imagine the layout of the field, however much effort is put into the description of it. While, when reading about houses or cities, I am more comfortable just imagining them even if in my imagination the door is on the other side of the room, etcetera. I wonder what this says about me as a reader?

I still have trouble keeping all the characters straight (I wonder if all of my posts about War and Peace are just going to repeat the same things over and over?) but I am having a little less trouble.

I think this section really showed us the flaws in some of the male characters. Pierre’s marriage is already over! Was he too quick to believe his wife was having an affair? What do you think? And what about that duel? I loved what Amy stated in her post:

Of course the idea of a duel is quite old fashioned and ridiculous and I thought it was amusing no one really thought they’d go through with it and they did and of course it wasn’t glorious–just like war, it was quick, stupid, and someone got hurt.

Such a smart observation! And I think very fitting. I will now be on the lookout for these small parallels.

Rostov. His loss of money. His treatment of Sonya’s love. These scenes were realistic, but quite painful for me to read! I am not sure if I like him very much. He seems quite self-centered at this point? I’d love to see some character growth for him during the upcoming 8 months of reading.

Prince Andrei’s storyline was interesting, though I am not sure what to think of him yet. There is some irony in the fact that he shows up when he was thought to be death, just as his wife is bringing new life into the world and then dies herself. I admit I am fascinated by how he seems to have turned away from war and battle, while his father who, if I remember correctly, was first reluctant about it is now passionately engaged with it? Will we see more of this? I’d like to have more exploration of the diverse reactions to war, the motivations to make certain choices, and the disillusionment.

I wonder about the women in this story though. That is, their characterisation. I feel they are a little.. flat? right now. They seem to be at the sidelines, waiting, getting hurt, mostly drifting along. I’d like one of them to stand up and act for herself (although I guess in a way Pierre’s wife has, but then – I wonder how sympathetically that was portrayed?). Mostly, I’d like Sonya to be treated better by Rostov?

And what about Pierre’s induction to freemasonry? I admit I was fascinated by the induction rituals, though also a bit uncomfortable. I know very little about freemasonry and I know that there are quite a few different interpretations of it in contemporary society, so I admit I kept wondering how realistic the portrayal of this induction was, or if it was Tolstoy’s imagination.. Nevertheless, it raises some interesting questions about faith and trying to introduce and convince others. There are parallels between Pierre’s introduction to these ideas by the traveller and then Pierre trying to convince Andrei, where the one succeeds and the other does not, and we are left to wonder why.. There is also the question whether the freemasons were really trying to help Pierre find a better course in life or whether it was about his money [there is very little attention to the fact that he pays them quite a lot, but it is there in the ceremony, and it does stand out sharply to the reader].

Anyway, parts three and four of Book II are up next for May.

Are you still reading along? Are you enjoying it? Who or what do you like best of all up to now? 

You can find the Mr. Linky to link to your own thoughts at Amy’s blog.

So.. What did I do for Queen’s Day? I bought books..

Surprise, surprise! I ended up buying eight books during a short visit to the city centre on Queen’s Day.

koninginnedag boeken

So, these are a sort of random selection, picked out knowing I had heard the name before, knowing other works by the author, or simply on a leap of faith. If you count these and find that there is one missing, then yes, the eighth book is not pictured as it is a book for my PhD research.

What do you think? Anything that was worth the three euro total I spent on them?

Announcing: Dutch Lit Fortnight 2013

Today marks the last Queen’s Day in a long while. It is the day on which Queen Beatrix abdicated and is now once more a princess, leading to the Netherlands having a new King in Willem-Alexander from today onwards. Today, half the population will be celebrating on the streets while the other half is probably following the ceremony on TV.

Me? In between doing both of these things I am thinking about the annual month dedicated to Dutch literature which I inaugurated two years ago. For a long while, I was not sure whether I should organise another dedicated month this year. Several issues came up that I won’t go into now. The key thing, however, is the fact that I simply do not have time to generate enough content, to read enough books, for a whole month. At the same time, after a year of growing recognition for some books written by Dutch authors, I did not want to forget about this event that helps me (and in a way forces me) to discover more of my own country’s literature, and simultaneously perhaps highlights some books that might be of interest to other international readers.

This is why I have decided to organise a Dutch Lit Fortnight this year.

Please feel very welcome to join me in reading one or more books of Dutch literature and writing about them on your blog or in the comment section of my posts, from the 17th of June until the 30th of June.

As in previous years I will be providing some suggested reading before the beginning of the month, and will also offer a giveaway or two.

If there is any interests, I am also contemplating a Read Along of either The Two Hearts of Kwasi Boachi by Arthur Japin or The Twin by Gerbrand Bakker.

If you cannot wait for my suggested this year, feel free to check the Dutch Lit Month tag on this blog, or the Dutch Literature in Translation Review Database, to which you are also invited to add URLs of your own reviews of Dutch literature in translation.

I hope you will contemplate joining me, as I´d love some company during these fourteen days!